Monday, April 29, 2024

How to Lose Friends and Infuriate People

  Much of the western world is best described as a contentious and polarized place(s) with a hefty tint towards the fractal. There is an obvious explanation for noticing the fractal patterns in medium to large Western cities, Western countries and the entire World by simply noting that there are different cultures and some can cultures get along with each other, while some cultures do not.

 A culture is made up more than just its foods, clothes, languages, and arts as there are also the general attitudes and the moral positions that are part of the package. In the year of someone’s Lord 2018, the Prime Minister of Canada is quoted as having said "There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada,'' and then went on to explain that Canada doesn’t define itself as a ‘nation state’ as strongly as the European nations do. This idea was flushed out more in more detail in the article “TITLE-TBD” published on Dec 12th, 2023.

 The ‘sub’ prefix in subculture use to mean subset though now it seems to imply subversion; how that shift happened has not been made obvious, though there are plenty of decent speculations to go around. It now seems that we can now bare witness to what happens when a non-subculture, but a completely different culture, enters Trudeau’s mosaic based pseudo-reality Canada. In 1933, on the baseball field at Christie Pits Park in Toronto CA. there was a ‘mostly peaceful protest’ when the team from the German neighborhood was to play a game with a team from the Jewish neighborhood; that game was not completed.

 The current political mantra seems to be boiled down to something as simple as ‘listen and believe’, be this applied to ‘the experts’, ‘the science’ or some other group and if you don’t believe or at least pretend you believe then you will be called an anti-something-phobe. If you show that the L&B narrative does have holes, there will be attempts to cut out your digital tongue as it were.

 DISCLAIMER:  This writing contains no legal advice, medical advice, or financial advice because the worst vice is advice.

On Punching Down
When a 3rd party accuses the party of the first part is punching down towards the party of the second part, the 3rd party has just judged that the party of the first part has superiority over the party of the second part, thus showing the 3rd party’s bigotry.

On Loving Ukraine but Hating Ukrainians
 War is known as ‘the meat grinder of men’ that eventually boils down to numbers, the number of bullets, the number of missiles, the number of tanks and ultimately the number of men. In 2022, the year of the recent invasion, the population of Russia was 144.2 M and that of Ukraine was 38 M; rough math shows that Ukraine would have to maintain a 3.5 to 1 kill ratio over the Russians to simple hold ground assuming all things being equal. For the last two some odd year things had been somewhat equal as both sides have had an average age of just over 40, though things are not so equal anymore as Ukraine recently lowered the age of their draft from 27 to 25. One indicator of how any war is going is just how far outside the category of ‘disposable men’ either side is willing to go.

 A question to be asked of those who support this war: Is the funding being put forward to support war or is the war being put forward to support the funding?

 On Reading the Room I
 Historically, being a man was dangerous yet simple while being a woman was safer yet quite complicated. Regardless if one is on the social construct team or the evolutionary team, and each side can explain why, that when a man and a woman walk into a room each of them will first scope out the women already present. Why precisely this happens is beyond the scope of this author, though it does happen, though some assumptions can be made as to what the drivers are.

 Incentive is the root cause for both the male and the female gaze, as people are and have always been driven by incentive. The next step in this argument is to posit what the general incentives are for the typical man and the typical woman entering the room, using the old school definition of men and women. The male eye seeks out the women in the room for reproductive reasons, with the caveat being that the ‘he’ is hoping, remembering or both. The female eye seeks out the women in the room for hierarchal reasons with the caveat being the ‘she’ sorting out if they are over-dressed or under-dressed for the occasion; why this is important is beyond the scope of the knowledge for this author.

 At the party, young women looking for husbands and husbands looking for young women is not as equal as it first appears.

 On Reading the Room II
‘Confession through projection’ is the way of saying every person will look at the world as if the whole world acts as they would act; an act that could be labeled as a micro-judgment. “I’m not judging” are objectively the words of a liar, subjectively though the words are seen as typically harmless due to what the words imply; the insinuation is that the liar will not be honest in conveying their judgment towards ‘the other’ for the purpose of avoiding some or all confrontation(s). A parallel can be found in a mother eating a flour based brick tells ‘little Billy’ that his cake tastes wonderful, a white lie as it were.

 On War
 “Si vis pacem, para bellum”, is from the Latin and it means "If you want peace, prepare for war". The “Western world” has developed a level of hubris where by it is assumed that the maxim above need not apply. Many people are currently being reminded that War is and always will be the very nature of existence. For the most part every non-mutually beneficial engagement or interaction is a war; though it is not War, seeing as there are predefined rules of conduct adhered to by all parties. 

 For ‘gits and shiggles’ as it were, please go to your favourite search engine and enter ‘define war’. One may not have to scroll down too far to find out that there is a legal definition for War thus making War governed by ‘the law of armed’ conflict, which is also known as “International Humanitarian Law.” Authoring legislation must involve some sort of psychedelic drug consumption because the normal use of the word ‘humanitarian’ as an adjective is – ‘concerned with or seeking to promote human welfare’.

 The International Criminal Court has 124 Party State members out of the 195 countries globally psst… US, Russian, England and China are not on the list. The ICC is under scrutiny from the United Nations, a UN where 130 member-states effectively disagree with the location or the outright existence of Israel; with two-thirds of the body created to maintain world peace, it doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to see why Israel has had such a hard time of things over the years.

 The good people at The Oxford Dictionary say that genocide means ‘the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group’, while the UN offers up as part of its definition ‘genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group’; the acts can be found on the United Nations’ genocide prevention web site. The word means ‘identifiable (including within a geographically limited area) and "substantial."’

 It seems that, like so many other words these days, the word GENOCIDE has fallen into the ‘Pit of Hyperbole’. Israel was fully out of The Gaza Strip in 2005 leaving behind some 1.31 million people, some fifteen years later that population grew to around 2.1 million. The current death toll within Gaza is hovering around 35,000 resulting in a population reduction of 0.0167, which hardly seems ‘substantial’.

 Ending on a sardonic note, perhaps this ruckus internationally would have been avoided if only Israel had put an iPhone assembly plant in The Gaza Strip with nets attached to the building to stop child labourers from committing suicide.

 

The first human being who hurled an insult instead of a stone was the founder of civilization.
Attributed to Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)

No comments:

Post a Comment