In one of his Federalist Papers, James Madison wrote: ‘Had
every Athenian citizen been a Socrates, every Athenian assembly would still
have been a mob.’ Madison ’s
words imply that even the most reasoned man would disagree with himself, if
that situation arose. People make choices every day, those choices for most are
not as clear as a mathematical solution and so any given person will be forced
to make their choice on what they understand of the situation in the moment
they choose.
Before getting into the meat of this article, this author
would like posit the idea that we are all watching the same movie and yet
walking away with our own unique opinion of which their favourite scene was.
In preparation for the article the definition of what is
politics given by The Oxford Dictionary provided a concise explanation: ‘the
activities associated with the governance of a country or other area,
especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or hoping
to achieve power.’
Who is thinking about
the children?
Children were once disposable and still are in some
countries on Earth due to environmental conditions; evidence of this can be
noted by birth rates and child mortality rates. Leaping through both time and
space, one can see that both birth and death rates have dropped in the advanced
countries where both technology and medicine have improved when one ignores
abortion.
Political overreach has long been a mainstay within the
political arena. Child abuse has been and always will be a matter in all
societies. The politicians sought to stamp abuse out where they could by
legislating away physical punishment by creating ‘child protection’ laws. Without
the capacity to provide consequence, many parents turned to reward for their
child management strategy.
Spoiler Alert – Spoiling children creates spoiled adults who
end up behaving like spoiled children, for they no other way. All societies of
any duration are based on the co-operation of the population at large. Some
societies are based on fear, some are based on religion, while others look to a
monarchy, and others still coalesce under a flag and a constitution. Of course these basic descriptions can be
combined in a variety of ways and proportion.
Returning to our time time/space machine we reach this the current
year, 2022, and we reconnoiter the present surroundings. What is noticed is
that the ‘same’ societies who thirty years earlier outlawed the spanking of
children are now promoting and legalizing double mastectomies and
hysterectomies , for girls below the age of consent and boys, also below the
age of consent are having their penises removed, for non-medical reasons. Is
the oath of ‘do no harm’ still a thing?
Sticking with the Hippocratic Oath, surely a yellow card and
potentially a red card needs be raised on the treatment of children during
pandemic restrictions; for those readers not familiar with soccer/football/calcio,
a quick entry in your favorite search engine will remove any confusion.
In regards to the pandemic restrictions politics took over
from the get go, as it was known that COVID-19 is a human coronavirus.
Coronaviruses were first identified in humans back in 1965 and include strains
such as SARS, MERS, Canine coronavirus HuPn-2018 and while the common cold is
typically a rhinovirus some strains are a mild coronavirus. To date, there has
not been a vaccine for any coronavirus and the latest round at a vaccine shows
that there still isn’t a cure for a coronavirus seeing as the vaccine is now
being described as a therapeutic, at least in Ontario
Canada .
Continuing on, it has been known for sometime that the
difference between females and males is that females are more ‘people’ focused
while males are more ‘thing’ focused; this has been shown in chimpanzees as
well. Additionally, others have asserted that children learn language by
watching the mouth shapes associated with the sounds being heard. This author
agrees with both of the ideas posited immediately above.
The two years of off and on isolation coupled with the off
and on masking practiced by many due to the fear, uncertainty and doubt
propagated by the political class has stripped many children of these much
needed experiences in their formative years. Moving up in age, after the
mobility and the linguistic basics are achieved the next goal in the
development of a child is basic is socialization. This phase is intended to
normalize children to societal standards with the intent of reducing the
bullies from bullying and the meek from being meekly.
The knock-on effect of the restrictions inflicted on school
age children will be a challenge for many societies for years to come. This
writer imagines the political class will lower the education standards to make
the current cohort of youngsters appear to be not as damaged as they have been;
the measure of a child should be based on substance and not presentation.
Is the planet being
saved?
The saying ‘Save the planet’ is quite clear in meaning, and
yet are the actions being taken look like the planet is being saved? Is the
reader willing to accept that when discussing this planet mankind is a part of
the planet’s ecosystem, thereby making mankind just as worthy as any other
inhabitant animal of this planet?
Like any complex system, the ecosystem of this planet is not
a single item issue; this has been made obvious by the multiple climate activist
groups that are single subject matter specialists. The Earth’s ecosystem, while
impacted by the animals of this planet, is not managed by the animals of this
planet. There is a certain level of hubris by mankind to think that they can
out manage the planet’s ecosystem better than Mother Nature herself.
No one seems to complain to the beavers about their ongoing
deforestation projects or the water management undertakings. When the beavers
become over enthusiastic, other animals will take notice and go shopping by preying
on them. When the lions over shop in the meat isle, the lions will deplete
their own food supply and will look on in wonder at the empty shelves as it
were. Nature is by its very nature self correcting, it is only mankind who
seems to want to step out of their lane for years on end mucking about with
Nature and the ecosystem.
Rivers and creeks much like forests have predated mankind by
quite a few years, regardless of the efforts of the local beaver population in
regards to creeks. Droughts and floods have long been part of the reality of
these waterways and it was only until mankind showed up that the rules were
changed as it was mankind and mankind alone who tried to change the rules, as
the rest of the animals didn’t take much notice of the rules they just lived or
died by them. Lookup ‘hunger stones europe ’ to
see the point.
This author feels that the true proof that climate change activists are typically
political is due to the lack of moral investment or actual actions taken on
behalf of the these persons and parties. There would be much more faith in
these climate champions would be on a surer footing atop the hill they wish to
die on if they were to put the money where they mouth was, as it were. To the
reader, how many of these climate champions would accept a rubbish bin being dropped
off and then proceed to fill it with every item that contained or required
fossil fuels in the supply chain?
Here are a few hints for the items listed on the destined
for that bin: computers, cell phones, refrigerators, electricity, electrical
grids, power meters, plumbing parts, tar based shingles, asphalt roads, diapers,
any clothing from factories with machines and child labour, solar panels and
the blades of a wind mill and finally carbon credits. Upon consideration, the
exemption list from the bin is probably a much shorter list.
One thing to keep in mind is that Mother Nature always wins.
Now on to relationship
The value attributed towards relationship is currently under
attack. Of course there are many levels of relationship; from the familial to
the neighbourly, along with the full spectrum of relationship types which falls
in between. Due to the present political discourse everything has been reduced
to a single ‘hot button’ issue that provides a single sound bite for both
sides. Anything beyond these peddled sound bites would be a conversation, a
conversation no-one seems to want to, or are incapable of having.
It has been said that politics is downstream of culture, yet
culture is downstream of media and when the media thrives on the idea of ‘if it
bleeds it leads’ the outcome seems quite obvious.
What about Politics?
This may seem like an odd question, a question that is right
up there with ‘if you throw a bucket of water into a pool, does the water in
the pool get any wetter?’ Politics doesn’t have to ruin politics, though it
often does, when and only when those involved prioritize the need for power
above and beyond the political goals for which they were elected. When the
political class loses sight of what they told people as to why they should be elected,
then yes politics will ruin politics.
In the closing of the Oxford
entry quoted above, it reads ‘conflict among parties having or hoping to
achieve power.’ When the maintenance of political power or the acquisition of
political power becomes the focus for the political class is when the political
pandering starts. Rather than agreeing on the problems of society and then
debating the path to a solution as politics of this nature drags down a society
when everyone begins raising their own personal ‘my problem is the biggest
problem’ flag in order to capture the attention of those people who control the
public purse and the legislative pen.
Politicians and their held close bootlickers currently have
a problem and that problem is that these political class people have a heavy trust
in poles and many of them seem to have slotted Social Media in as a form of polling;
the premise being that if one person types it, then ten people think it and one
hundred people feel it, for that is how poling works. Imagine any poll where
the respondents step up to check the boxes over being randomly selected; this
scenario would out push any push-poll ever taken, thus making society at large seem as divisive as Twitter itself.
So yes, politics can ruin everything but it doesn’t have too,
if more people lived by the motto ‘stop, look and listen’.
NOTES
Define: Politics
Miriam - Webster –
a:
the art or science of government
b: the art or science concerned with guiding or
influencing governmental policy
c: the art or science concerned with winning and
holding control over a government
No comments:
Post a Comment