An argument for 2A

Authors Note: As part of my testing of this new platform for my writings I will of course have to tests the limits. I plan on keeping the same basic format as the previous writings and I have no intent to add in pictures or videos. The test I'm going to perform is to see if there are any limits, within the scope and style of my writings. I'm not a big fan of profanity - though from time to time it is appropriate to use the word 'fuck' and as such I will use the word 'fuck' or similar words when appropriate.

An argument for 2A

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial has been an interesting state of affairs, though what I've also been paying attention to are the reactions to the reactions to the trial. The list below includes some of the reactions this author has found most interesting:

• Shortly after the incident Master Rittenhouse, who is now referred to as Mr. Rittenhouse because he is no longer a minor, was labeled as a White supremacist in the media - though he only shot people who were/are white.
• Shortly after the incident, it was claimed by the media that  Mr. Rittenhouse carried his firearm across a State line, thus breaking the law - though this was shown not to be the case. 
• Shortly after the incident, Mr. Rittenhouse, was alleged by the media outlets to be illegally carrying a firearm as he was under the age of 18. The laws of Wisconsin do permit this - see 948.60(3)
• Shortly after the incident, Mr. Rittenhouse was alleged to be part of a militia group by some aspects of the media
  

As a refresher let us bring back the words of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Moving on...

Mr. Rittenhouse, as per my last bullet point above, was accused of being part of a militia. In the year of someone's Lord 2020 when the 'peaceful protesters' were burning down buildings and looting businesses, all the while the police stand by and let chaos rule and run the streets. When the police abdicated their responsibilities to 'Serve and Protect'; some people(s) will pickup the slack on that front and go about acting in a way that is necessary to the security of one's own life and the property they have earned via the labour of their family and themselves. A collection of people(s) can form a state.

After the Second comma:

In support of the people to remain free and to protect the property that they worked for, and that their fathers worked for, and that their fathers fathers worked for, and that their fathers fathers fathers worked for; a person shall NOT be disarmed by the government. 

Is this really about justice?

It is the opinion of this author that the the legal action taken against Mr. Rittenhouse has nothing to do with the law. Respect for the law and for justice has been superseded by the political weaponization of the judicial system. Consider the bullet points above and think about how much effort the Left leaning media outlets made to get ahead of the court case. There are now two courts and each of these courts comes complete with its own jury; court a) is the court of public opinion and court b) comes with an actual judge who has knowledge of the law.

Next we can look at the treatment given to some of the actors involved. Mr. Rittenhouse was charged with two accounts of murder and a single account of attempted murder. The other actor worth mentioning is Gaige Grosskreutz, who is the sole survivor of the three people shot. Mr. Grosskreutz admitted to holding not just a pistol but also a phone for the purpose of recording. Mr. Grosskreutz has not been charged for carrying a concealed weapon for which the permit to conceal had expired. Additionally, while a court order had been been drafted and approved for Mr. Grosskreutz's phone, it was never served. 

Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger pulled just about every dirty sock out of his legal hamper. Mr.Binger has been admonished several times by the judge. Mr. Binger based much of his case on emotion over the facts of the case. It has been suggested that Mr. Binger has in the past run for the office of District Attorney and that he intends to run again. The office of the DA is not to seek a conviction, the purpose is to seek justice. The expediency of the charges laid and the tactics being deployed by Mr. Binger has convinced this author that Mr. Binger is most comfortable in the court of public opinion and not a court conducting the business of law and justice. 

I trust you will all conduct yourselves accordingly.

Thank you for your time, and all regards.

-RD-