The idea of the Philosopher King was laid out in Plato’s
Republic. The Philosopher King would, in theory, be a man who uses his
philosophical knowledge and temperament to guide his politics and accompanying
power. Plato eventually abandoned this hypothetical mode of government in
favour of one with a greater distribution, and by extension, a greater dilution
of power for any individual.
As a member of the demos, a plebeian, a lowly peasant if you
will, but definitely not a member of the political class, I’m going to put
forth some ideas that if implemented might for at least some time, make a
better world.
On politicians and
politics
One of the problems in modern politics is a serious lack of ‘skin
in the game’ for the politicians. In this age of the Internet/Information
overload, politicians are often given a pass that the lowly peasants would at
least get a stern talking to or a summons for; it used to be that with great
power came great responsibility. The responsibility portion of that equation now
seems to have been tossed out the window of a moving car, as if it was an unwanted
puppy.
The obvious response is to re-install consequence, and here
are some ideas up for consideration:
1.) For
each million, insert currency here, printed outside of the government’s budget
each and every political representative pays 1,000 Dollars, British pounds,
Euros, or whatever is applicable.
1.1) So if a
billion extra dollars are printed each and every representative would be out
$1M.
2.) Any
proposed legislation that is struck down by the courts imposes a moratorium on that
politician’s next submission, the length of which is still to be sorted out.
2.1) This
provides for an anti-SLAPP[i] (Strategic
Lawsuits Against Public Participation) like imposition on each and every
politician.
3.) Interest
rates, a literal double edged sword, must be minimized when inflation out-paces
wage increases, as the week-to-week people will take a hit which can/will
render them homeless.
3.1) High
interest rates, coupled with high inflation stagnates cash flow thus causing
the crippling of any society.
4.) Policies
have long term impact and as such the pensions of politicians are to be inversely
linked to interest rates.
Another slice of the political pie is the civil-service. The
civil-service is more than just accountants, actuaries, file clerks, lawyers,
and statisticians; civil-servants are also influencers of policy.
1.) Much
like the credits at the end of a movie, credit must be given where credit is
due for civil-servants and as such each and every piece of legislation
presented needs to list all civil-servant contributors.
1.1) Consultants
paid out of the public purse can be listed like the ‘best-boy electrician’ is.
2.) Policies
have long term impact and as such the pensions of senior civil-servants are to
be inversely linked to interest rates; police, firefighters and other public
facing works would be exempt.
Of course, in this the current year, politics and money often
go hand in hand, and this must be curtailed. There are two simple steps
regarding money and politics to disentangle these two items: A) only those
citizens who can be incarcerated can vote and/or donate, and B) anyone who
receives an income from the government is bared from voting and/or donating the
tier of government for which they work. I’ll break this down in the next few
paragraphs.
Americans, you are pretty much the worst, or the best
example of item A. America has limits on how much a single person can donate to
a politician/party. Then came the idea of the Public Action Committee, or
‘Super PAC’ which allows for independent expenditures on the behalf of a
politician or party; please cut the crap and just call this donating.
Organizational based donations to the government are to be
stopped. Organizations can be companies, trade unions, None Government
Organizations (NGOs), or other lobbyists. For example, the leaders of a company
may donate to a political party that will create regulations within the
company’s vertical. A number of outcomes result from this practice, such as:
regulatory burdens that stifle market entry for new companies, a slowing of
innovation due to the lack of innovation, a limiting of wage opportunities, and
the profitability of shareholders. In short, this practice promotes the
monopolization of any sector of commerce.
Item B is a safeguard against an over indulgence in self interest
at the unwilling expense of others. Once the civil-service, the body of
government, becomes large enough and is coupled with a large enough portion of
the population reliant on social handouts a pseudo-majority is formed due to
the apathy of many citizens. Any person or party hunting for power will simply
for the sake of power leverage this combined cohort in their pursuits.
On Education:
The final exam for every high-school student, GSCEs for you
British types, is the same exam that immigrants need to pass in order to obtain
citizenship. This exam can only be changed by a national referendum once per
decade, where each question is maintained, dismissed, or introduced by popular
vote. Equally, if a migrant can pass a Canadian exam for a post secondary
degree then that person must be handed that degree; as this seems only fair.
Of all the subjects taught in high-school, and below,
history is the one most open to contention as history is typically written by
the victors, and typically with a ‘we were not the baddies’ perspective. Of
course, who the bad guys were changes under a new regime. For example it is
claimed that three to five hundred Conquistadors subdued the Aztec
civilization, made up of thousands; rather than a mass slaughter carried by a propped-up
neighboring tribe seeking revenge for a prolonged demand of human sacrifices.
In a close second, in this the current year, is human biology;
here an effort will be made to avoid a rhetorical argument as the intent is to
provide an argument against rhetoric. Rhetoric is often used in advertising to
impress upon the audience a feeling of ‘post hoc ergo propter hoc’, more widely
known as ‘when you buy this beer, you will get these attractive women’. A more recent version of this argumentative
technique is to shift the meaning of words to retroactively include something
that the word never meant before; with the hope that no-one will notice or
care. This can be seen in the abuse of the word ‘women’, as trans-women are now
being crow-bared into the collective term ‘women’ at the expense of women.
Mathematics needs to be returned to pencil, paper and the
blackboard for the junior grades. Additionally, PEMDAS/BEDMAS is both a lie and
misdirection as it ignores juxtaposition; the equation ‘6 ÷ 2(1+2) = ?’ has
raised controversy in that some people think the answer is 1 while others
believe the answer to be 9. The basic question that needs to be made clear is
if juxtaposition implies brackets or not; to test this, substitute X for (1+2) and use the two proposed
answers on the right hand side of the of the equals sign and solve for X using the PEMDAS rules.
Still on mathematics, and this is a critique of society at
large which started in my high school years with the introduction of
calculators. Going back to the tantalizing conundrum of the equation, ‘6 ÷
2(1+2) = ?’, when the equation is entered into Microsoft Excel it would look
like ‘= 6 ÷ 2(1+2)’, Excel will suggests the rewrite ‘= 6 ÷ 2*(1+2)’ which
unbinds the 2 from the parentheses. This is of course not the same if the 2 is bound
to the parentheses by juxtaposition which in Excel would be expressed with the
equation ‘= 6 ÷ (2*(1+2))’. The juxtaposition rule was provided to eliminate
the need for writing brackets and now it appears that everyone is going to have
to go back to writing brackets for the sake of having a clear mathematical
grammar.
As for geography, someone once said something along the
lines of: ‘America
is in perpetual conflict to teach its people the geography of the world that
they didn’t learn in school.’
Society and Socialization:
Politics was put first in this article due to its reach and
power. Of course politicians can only derive their power from the society in
which they operate. We have seen many times in history what happens when the
people turn against the political; from Cesar, to the French revolution,
Napoleon (twice), the Romanov family, Mussolini, Nicolae Ceaușescu, every Prime
Minister ever voted out of office, and the occasional military coup.
‘Protected classes/characteristics’ in law, along with
hate-speech laws are to be repealed[ii].
By creating protected classes a debatable hierarchy is formed and hate-speech
laws simply seek to deny the ability for a person to show their true colours,
all the while denying society the ability to know said person’s true self. Does
anyone seriously believe that laws stifling a person’s speech will halt that
person’s bigotry, or is it more likely to add fuel to that fire?
In law, all persons must be protected and no person may be
more protected than others, thank you Mr. Orwell; children are exempt from this
concept for they must be held with a special standing in society. Children are
not allowed to drink, get tattoos, drive, or have consensual sex; as they are considered
mentally innocent and therefore are by default to be protected due to lacking
the ability to consent.
In addition, a penalty would be imposed for provably false
accusations; a starting point would be the minimum penalty of the alleged crime
being put forth for prosecution, once again the principle of anti-SLAPP comes
into play. The dismissal of an accusation MUST NOT be taken as proof of a false
accusation.
No organization self-identifying based on an immutable
characteristic shall receive monies collected through taxation without ALL similar
NGOs, of equal positioning, receiving an equal amount else the government be
labeled ‘phobic’ and held to account. Tax exemption is, within the calculation
of gross v. net monies and must positioned as an equivalent to tax money
presentation, and as such must be treated with an equal non-bias consideration.
The duty of any government is to serve and protect each and every citizen
equally.
Beyond 24 hrs:
Andrew Breitbart is attributed with the quote, ‘politics is
downstream from culture’ and yet it is the politicians who run the education
systems, thus setting up an Ouroboros[iii]
like situation. With regards to culture and therefore the politics, if
Breitbart is to be believed, there needs to be a common underlying belief to maintain
a cohesive and successful society, and this can’t be fixed in a day.
The introduction of a new belief or social narrative will
upset the applecart of social stability and cohesion When a society’s narrative
is lost the end of that culture is not far behind, or is that when a culture’s
narrative is lost the end of societal collapse is not far behind; this chicken
vs. egg problem does seem somewhat hard to crack.
In previous generations the narrative was ‘a better world
for my children’ and now that message seems to be lost or least has taken a
back seat to the much simpler ‘me’. This of course is not ubiquitous across all
parents, for some have remained vigilant on behalf of their children, while
others who in the past took an apathetic approach are now stepping up for
various reasons; of course that previous parental apathy was the root cause for
the reasons now under scrutiny.
Many countries and companies dedicate an entire month to
celebrate in name what was once called a sin; social acceptance of this
previous sin was gained under a moderate level of temperance by the original advocates
is now facing social backlash under this new more zealous regime displaying public
exhibitions that are well beyond affection. I posit that for those who held and
still hold that original position of asking for normality and equality need to speak
out against the zealots to keep the ground previously gained, and I can’t fix
this at all.
Another choice that has been left to the adults in the room
is personal health, as it should be; and yet so many of these adults who abdicated
their responsibility towards self-health expect that others will makeup for
their choices. While many people believe in progressive taxes based on wealth, I
posit that clothes prices based on BMI would be the cause of many ‘mostly
peaceful demonstrations’. Currently, demonstrations take the form of those showing
their disappointment in the system do so by doing smash-and-grabs for jewelry,
Nike shoes, TVs, and Louis Vuitton bags.
In short, as our society writ large and on some points
individually, the Seven Deadly Sins[iv]
have become the framing basis for our way of life in the West. In looking at
the news I can’t help but see the 7-Sins on full display. For some reason I really
like the word trebuchet though for metaphorical reasons the ballista is a
better fit, as this machine of war is based on tension rather than gravity, as
you will see.
Upon reflection, the duration of my life so far has seen an
ever-tightening rope in society; and now it seems that rope has already been
made wet to allow for more stretching thus creating more tension upon drying,
which seems to be now; leaving me to wonder if our social/cultural ballista can
withstand all the tensile forces being applied.
Tell me if you heard this before: massive public and private
debt, high inflation, a shortage of housing, a shortage of an effective work
force, declining population, and the ‘othering’ of identified groups; now
decide for yourself what the near future will look like.
[i] SLAPP
suits – or Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation – are actions
typically brought by persons subject to public criticism in an effort to
silence or intimidate their critics.
[ii] June 29th
2023, The SCOTUS repealed Affirmative Action for University entrance.
[iii] The
ouroboros or uroboros is an ancient symbol depicting a serpent or
dragon eating its own tail.
[iv] The
deadly sin are Pride, Greed, Wrath, Envy, Lust, Gluttony and Sloth